stakingmarket
  • Home
  • Validator Scoring Rubric
  • Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Validator Scoring Rubric
  • Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
stakingmarket
No Result
View All Result
Home Review

Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

Greg by Greg
January 17, 2020
in Review
59
0
Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

*Note: This review and score is purely based on the information disclosed by the validator service and the scoring rubric
Last Updated: Oct 7, 2019

About Infinity Stones

Infinity Stones’ validator service operates across the Cosmos, EOS, TRON, LOOM, Tezos, and IRISnet blockchains. Built by a team of PhD’s from Georgia Tech, Infinity Stones differentiates itself with its blockchain-agnostic validation approach, as well as its strong uptime guarantees and insurance policy. Infinity Stones presently offers 10-20% commission validation services, and is based across Oregon, Singapore, and China. 

Supported Chains

  • CosmosHub
  • EOS
  • Tron
  • LOOM
  • Tezos
  • IRISnet
  • Bytom
  • Wanchain
  • Iotex
  • Algorand
  • Vechain

General Ratings:

Overall54
Company50
Code/Infrastructure56
Operations56

Company:

Team Background (50/100)

  • Full-Time/Part-Time (10/10)
  • Prior Blockchain Dev/Impact (0/10)
  • Systems Experience (5/10)
  • Recognizability (5/10)

Current Voting Power (27/100)

  • Total Staked: (6/10)
  • Unique Self-Bonders: (2/10)
  • Commissions: (0/10)

Historical Metrics (60/100)

  • Uptime (10/10)
  • Proposals (2/10)

Bonus (+10)

  • Legal Compliance/Insurance (+5)
  • Innovations (+5)

Team

Infinity Stones was founded by a group of PhD’s from Georgia Tech in May 2018. The team includes Sili Zhao (business analyst), and Emily Zhu (founder), as well as a number of other engineers and business development personnel spread across the US and China.

The core Infinity Stones team has reportedly been following the blockchain industry for multiple years, and has recently taken its first foray into the space with its PoS validation services. The team has now grown to six people in the United States, and 10+ in China. These team members in China are largely focused on product and engineering – specifically trying to build additional infrastructure for Infinity Stones’ staking pool. The US team is reportedly focused on branding, marketing, and business development – as well as some infrastructure dev. Brief bios of some of the team can be found below:

Founder: Unknown. This individual is reportedly a structural engineer by background, and an alumni of tech giants like Google Cloud. Infinity Stones’ founder is currently in china, alongside the engineering team

CEO: Unknown. Georgia Tech PhD. Specialization in IoT devices. Previously worked at Oracle. Focus at Infinity Stones is IoT and systems.

Head of Engineering: Unknown. Previously a Google engineer. Experienced in operational security and cloud security. Project lead on Infinity Stones’ patent-pending HSM module. 

Chief Product Officer: Unknown. Georgia Tech PhD. 10 years experience in product development and cloud computing. 

Alerts Lead: Unknown. Previously a Google engineer. Responsible for monitoring, maintenance, and disaster recovery. 

The Infinity Stones team is all full-time on this project. 

Stake

Cosmos

Infinity Stones is presently the #30 validator on the Cosmos hub by delegation with ~1.508 million atoms delegated. At time of writing, this translates to approximately $5.47M USD. The majority of these funds (1.031 million) come from a single address, which is predicted to belong to either i) the Infinity Stones team, or ii) Infinity Stones seed investors. Infinity Stones offers 10% commission on this service – a rate slightly higher than industry standard. 

EOS

Infinity Stones is presently the #9 validator on EOS with ~144.35 million votes. These votes have come from 7,600 thousand unique accounts. 

TRON

Infinity Stones is presently the #19 validator on the TRON by delegation with ~224 million

votes. The majority of these votes (200 million) come from a single address, which is predicted to belong to either i) the Infinity Stones team, or ii) Infinity Stones seed investors.

LOOM

Infinity Stones is presently the #16 validator on the LOOM network with ~3.613 million LOOM staked. At time of writing, this translates to approximately ~$160,000 USD. Over 60% of these funds have been self-delegated. Infinity Stones offers 15% commission on this service – a rate slightly below than industry standard. 

Tezos

Information unavailable. If you know the Infinity Stones Tezos address, reach out.

IRISNet

Infinity Stones is presently the #59 validator on IRIS network with ~2.246 million IRIS staked. At time of writing, this translates to approximately ~$82,000 USD. Over 99% of these funds have been delegated from a single third party address. Infinity Stones offers 20% commission on this service – a rate above industry standard.

Historic Metrics

Infinity Stones has maintained near 100% uptime since its entrance into Cosmos’ active validator set. The team has missed 50 out of 1000 precommits once and 150 consecutive precommits twice in the past 5 months. The company has 0.88% of the network’s voting power; a number that has been maintained relatively neutral over the past few months.


Of the five significant proposals on the Cosmos Hub thus far, Infinity Stones has participated in one (20%). The team voted in accordance with popular opinion on this proposal (a resolve for a security critical bug). 

On IRIS Network, Infinity Stones hasn’t had any notable downtime. The company is also listed as “active” on LOOM network at time of writing.

Community

Infinity Stones describes itself as the “bridge” between different blockchains – with a goal to connect to as many blockchains as possible. The company focuses stringently on maximizing uptime with a standard architecture across networks – with desired downtime periods of less than 20 seconds per downtime event. At time of writing, the Infinity Stones team is also working on a DAO to encourage more active participation in governance. The team presently solely participates in governance primarily across TRON, EOS, and Cosmos, but sees itself improving its breadth of governance activity in the future.

Slashing Procedures

Infinity Stones is one of the few projects that offers “downtime rewards” – an insurance policy against downtime events. The company presently has a partnership with Circle – a leading P2P payments company, which covers all slashing resultant of downtime. This policy is presently only in place on Infinity Stones’ Cosmos validator, however will be expanded on in the future.

Code/Infrastructure

Validators (27/100)

  • Failover (8/30)

Sentries (100/100)

  • Private Peering (10/10)
  • Agreements with other Validators (unknown/10)
  • Sentry Scaling (10/10)
    • Snapshotting
    • Backup Strategy

Infinity Stones presently operates all validator nodes in the cloud, primarily using AWS. The company employs a master-slave architecture on validator nodes, with signatures originating from cloud-based HSMs. All validators can only be accessed inside a VPN. The company made the decision to “go cloud” for the early stages of its setup, however may transition to a physical setup in the future. Automatic failover is in place at time of writing. 

Sentry Architecture

Infinity Stones presently deploys a standard sentry architecture with private peering. Sentries are exposed on a public P2P network for RPC’s, while the Infinity Stones Validator nodes only serve requests from known Infinity Stones sentries. Infinity Stones additionally has snapshotting and autoscaling configured. This helps with the rapid deployment of new sentries in the face of Network instability and/or DoS attacks.

Custom Code

Custom code developed by Infinity Stones to date has been focused on adaptive key management. The Infinity Stones team has done in-house development to make Cosmos and other validated networks compatible with AWS CloudHSM.  

Infinity Stones has additionally stated they have built a disaster recovery system designed to reduce downtime events to 20-60 seconds. No comments were made on whether the disaster recovery system specification or architecture would be made open source in the future.

Operations:

Monitoring Tools (67 /100)

  • Network Level (5/10)
  • Hardware Level (5/10)
  • Paging (10/10)

Single Point of Failure (100/100)

  • Multi-Cloud (10/10)
  • Multi-Region  (10/10)

Key Management (25/100)

  • HSM Selections (0/10)
  • Smart Key Management (5/10)

Validator Access (0/100)

  • Physical/Remote (0/10)

Monitoring Tools

Infinity Stones maintains a 24 hour rotation maintained by DevOps engineers to monitor abnormal events. This rotation features 12 hours watch by their US team, and 12 hours watch by their Chinese team. Standard open source monitoring tools are used. Autoscaling is triggered through monitoring tool events.

Single Points of Failure

Infinity Stones operates sentries across multiple cloud providers, including AWS, Google Cloud, and Alicloud. Within each provider, Infinity Stones uses multiple regions, mitigating issues caused by geography. In a recent article, Infinity Stones claimed more than 100 nodes are presently under their management.

Key Management

InfinityStones presently uses AWS CloudHSM as their Hardware Security Module. These devices are accessed through AWS Cloud Services, exposing potential vulnerabilities if a key AWS account were to be breached. Based on each chain’s implementation, Infinity Stones will do secondary development as well. For example, Cosmos is using SECP256K1 algorithm for encryption which is supported by AWS CloudHSM. However, Cosmos has not yet integrated this feature into its codebase. The Infinity Stones team has done secondary in-house development to make Cosmos compatible with AWS CloudHSM.

Validator Access

Access to physical hardware is non-existent in Infinity Stones’ setup. This is typically considered a negative; as troubleshooting cloud services is more difficult and complicated than unplugging and fixing malfunctions in a physical machine. 

Introspective Analysis

When prompted, the Infinity Stones team provided the following focal point for future efforts: 

“Infinity Stones wants to be a one-stop shop for customers to i) stake tokens, ii) participate in governance, and iii) engage with staking pool product offerings (rewards monitoring, fast payouts, etc.)”

Here is a list of our full validator rankings!

The Review

Staked.Us

5.7 Score

Review Breakdown

  • Company 0
  • Code/Infrastructure 0
  • Operations 0

Related Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Forbole Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Load More

Latest Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis

B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Certus.One Validator Review and Analysis

Certus.One Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Cosmostation Validator Review and Analysis

Cosmostation Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Chorus.One Validator Review and Analysis

Chorus.One Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Cryptium Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Cryptium Labs Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators

Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators

by Greg
November 19, 2019
0

...

Sikka Validator Review and Analysis

Sikka Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

SimplyVC Validator Review and Analysis

SimplyVC Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Sparkpool Validator Review and Analysis

Sparkpool Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Validator.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Validator.Network Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Ztake Validator Review and Analysis

Ztake Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

StakeWith.Us Validator Review and Analysis

StakeWith.Us Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Staked.Us Validator Review and Analysis

Staked.Us Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Recent Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020

Categories

  • Guide
  • Review

Site Navigation

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Staking Market is focused on providing the best in-depth information on Proof of Stake blockchains. Learn about yield, APR, validators and more!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Staking.Market

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Staking.Market

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In