stakingmarket
  • Home
  • Validator Scoring Rubric
  • Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Validator Scoring Rubric
  • Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
stakingmarket
No Result
View All Result
Home Review

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

Greg by Greg
January 17, 2020
in Review
67
0
Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

*Note: This review and score is purely based on the information disclosed by the validator service and the scoring rubric.
Last Updated: Oct 3, 2019

About Forbole

Forbole is a Cosmos Hub Validator. Forbole was named winners in Game of Stakes and HackAtom3, solidifying their case as a top-tier Cosmos validator. Forbole’s takes on a unique approach to commission rates, allowing their delegators to choose their own rate in Forboles, #PWYW campaign. (#PayWhatYouWant)

Supported Chains

  • CosmosHub
  • Iris
  • Terra

General Ratings:

Overall72
Company63
Code/Infrastructure77
Operations76

Company:

Team Background (38/100)

  • Full-Time/Part-Time (10/10)
  • Prior Blockchain Dev/Impact (5/10)
  • Systems Experience (0/10)
  • Recognizability (0/10)

Current Voting Power (80/100)

  • Total Staked: (9/10)
  • Unique Self-Bonders: (10/10)
  • Commissions: (5/10)

Historical Metrics (65/100)

  • Uptime (8/10)
  • Proposals (5/10)

Bonus (+5)

  • Legal Compliance/Insurance (0)
  • Innovations (+5)

Team

Forbole is a validator service located in Hong Kong. The company was co-founded by Kwun Yeung and Terence Lam, both with an enthusiasm on Proof-of-Stake consensus networks. They started their blockchain development work and founded Forbole in the middle of 2017, with an attempt to launch their own blockchain using the Cosmos SDK. At the time, the SDK was not mature and the team decided to run a validator service and understand processes behind a high quality validator before launched their own PoS based chain.

Prior to Forbole, both Kwun and Terence ran a digital agency specialized in web and mobile applications. Kwun and Terence helped financial institutions build web applications with high security in mind. These security practices and principles have been carried over to Forbole and is of high priority.

Stake

Forbole is a significant validator on the CosmosHub and IRISnet networks, #12 and #4 respectively. At the time of writing, Forbole’s stake accounts for a ~2.7% voting power in the CosmosHub and a 3.12% voting power in IRISInet. The service has a nice spread of delegators in the cosmos network, with 30+ delegations above the $100,000 USD threshold. However, 94.54% of Forbole’s stake in IRISnet comes from a single address. The top 3 delegators bumps this up to 99.95%.

Forbole also validates on the Terra network  with a less significant impact. The service has a 0.5% voting power with 99.73% of their stake coming from 2 addresses.

Historic Metrics

Forbole has been running their validator service since the launch of the Cosmos and IRISnet. As a winner in Game of Stakes and award winning monitoring practices, Forbole has maintained excellent uptime since launch, at 100%. Hubble has a single log for the service in both the Cosmos and IRISnet of missed precommits at exactly June 07.

Community

Forbole has created and open-sourced notable projects. The team is well known for their cosmos explorer, Big Dipper. The explorer supports the Cosmos Hub, IRISnet, and Terra. Forbole was named a winner in HackAtom3 for another project, gaia_bot_monitor. The tool is a two-fold tooling solution for up-to-date push notifications regarding the status of a validator service.


Forbole also regularly posts to their blog. The team’s posts varies in topics from reasoning behind their votes in governance proposals to analysis of their approaches such as their experimental commision rates. In our discussion, it was noted that the team believes delegators should be more educated about validators. Forbole believes that delegating to them is like delegating to a community.

Slashing Procedures

Forbole expects their delegators to understand the risks associated with delegating to their service. The company site lists a 99.98% uptime guarantee for their validator nodes. However, no formal agreements are in place to compensate delegators if this agreement is broken.

Code/Infrastructure

Validators (53/100)

  • Failover (16/30)

Sentries (100/100)

  • Private Peering (10/10)
  • Agreements with other Validators (10/10)
  • Sentry Scaling (10/10)
    • Snapshotting
    • Backup Strategy

Forbole makes use of an active/passive setup for their validator architecture, prioritizes safety over liveness. The validator nodes are currently located in a single data center in Hong Kong. Regionally distributed validator nodes are planned for in the future. The nodes are additionally hidden behind a layer of relayers within a private network. These relayers are privately peered with trusted validators to maintain connectivity if a large scale outage causes sentry nodes to go offline.

Sentry Architecture

Forbole makes use of a layered sentry architecture in front of their validator nodes. Their public/private sentry and relay nodes are deployed across different cloud providers. The team saw no downtime even when there was a large outage with GCP (google cloud provider).

Custom Code

The team has not instrumented the gaia binaries but has written custom software that monitors the health of their nodes. See Operations for more detail.

Operations:

Monitoring Tools (67 /100)

  • Network Level (5/10)
  • Hardware Level (5/10)
  • Paging (10/10)

Single Point of Failure (50/100)

  • Multi-Cloud (10/10)
  • Multi-Region  (0/10)

Key Management (75/100)

  • HSM Selections (10/10)
  • Smart Key Management (5/10)

Validator Access (100/100)

  • Physical/Remote (10/10)

Monitoring Tools

Forbole uses standard practices for monitoring the health of their validator nodes. For their sentry nodes, cloud provider tools are used to monitor resource usage. The team also runs a monitor node that keeps track of changes to the validator node. The validator node’s liveness, and latency are looked after. An on-call rotation exists between the team, with a custom built bot that will send push notifications of any alarming changes.

The KMS is also monitored by an external node that reports the latest signed height and checks that the KMS is signing to the reported height.

Single Points of Failure

Forbole makes use of multiple cloud provider and a redundant passive validator node to failover to. However, given than both nodes and the KMS are located in a single location, the team’s data center in Hong Kong is a Single Point of Failure in Forbole’s system.

Key Management

Forbole uses the best HSM available for their validator nodes, the YubiHSM2. The HSM is located on a separate server behind the Tendermint KMS that provides software-based double sign protection.

Validator Access

The validator nodes are located in single data center in Hong Kong. The location can be physically accessed if required by the team within 1 hour. At least one individual is always present in the city at all times.

Remote access to their validator node cannot be achieved directly. A VPN connection to a seperate private node that communicates to the validator.

Introspective Analysis

When asked to provide an introspective analysis, Forbole stated that they believe there is a lack of diverse and quality validators in the community. To help with this, the team wants to put in more effort in education to assist delegators in understanding the validating space.

Forbole’s location in Hong Kong also provides the team with access to the Chinese market without sacrificing capitalism. It is one of the team’s goals to lead in building the validator community within Asia. Almost all popular validator are currently located throughout Europe and America.

Here is a list of our full validator rankings!

The Review

Staked.Us

7 Score

Review Breakdown

  • Company 0
  • Code/Infrastructure 0
  • Operations 0

Related Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis
Review

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis
Review

B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Load More

Latest Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

Bitfish Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis

B-Harvest Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Certus.One Validator Review and Analysis

Certus.One Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Cosmostation Validator Review and Analysis

Cosmostation Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Chorus.One Validator Review and Analysis

Chorus.One Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Cryptium Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Cryptium Labs Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

Infinity Stones Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators

Ultimate Guide to Blockchain Validators

by Greg
November 19, 2019
0

...

Sikka Validator Review and Analysis

Sikka Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

SimplyVC Validator Review and Analysis

SimplyVC Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Sparkpool Validator Review and Analysis

Sparkpool Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Validator.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Validator.Network Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

Ztake Validator Review and Analysis

Ztake Validator Review and Analysis

by adminadmin

...

StakeWith.Us Validator Review and Analysis

StakeWith.Us Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Staked.Us Validator Review and Analysis

Staked.Us Validator Review and Analysis

by Greg

...

Recent Posts

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

Figment.Network Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

Forbole Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020
Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

Polychain Labs Validator Review and Analysis

January 17, 2020

Categories

  • Guide
  • Review

Site Navigation

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Staking Market is focused on providing the best in-depth information on Proof of Stake blockchains. Learn about yield, APR, validators and more!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Staking.Market

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Staking.Market

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In